With some degree of anxiety, we’re all anticipating a return to our old lives, even though we may not know what that might look like. And one hopes the vaccines will become widely administered and that they’ll be effective against the COVID variants, many of us are looking forward to that time later this year when we’ll see that “swing back” or rebound.
We just don’t exactly what it will look like or feel like. Or when it will happen.
It’s the same thing with the radio business, and many other industries – including travel, concerts, sports, and dining. That is, our leisurely pursuits. And as part of the entertainment landscape, broadcast radio operators are tasked with calculating what our world will be like, and how to meet the moment. We are all trying to visualize our futures.
But as millions of us will head to our cars, to beaches, to sports arenas, and to concert halls, it’s hard not to imagine that advertising and marketing will, in fact, rebound. After all, businesses will have to get the word out. And street teams will have to be rehired, retained, and deployed in local markets everywhere.
And how might all of that impact hiring post-COVID? Will radio broadcasters be looking for different kinds of employees and most importantly, different skill sets for this next critical phase of the medium’s cycle?
You’d hope so.
And that’s why the ad at the top of this blog post should have a nostalgic ring of familiarity for old timers in radio. For those who don’t recognize some of the terms, just trust me what it took to get a radio job in the ’80s has been redefined by new and changing industry needs.
The ad is something I mocked up for a presentation I’ve been doing for more than 20 years “Building Better DJs” – for air talent and programming teams to make the point the needs of the radio business are changing.
And sadly, too many PDs and way too many prospective hosts, talent, DJs – whatever we want to call them – may not be as prepared for “What’s next?” as they might think. The ad was meant to typify the standard “help wanted” post you’d see in multitudes in Radio & Records and other industry publications. They tended to be similar – focusing on on-air performance, and in many cases, having that FCC third class license – with that all-important endorsement.
That’s not to say it was easy to get a radio job in 1979. It wasn’t. The competition was stiff, and even though most stations had live talent on the air 24/7 and “shifts” were four hours long, the frenzy to get a radio job – especially that first one – was intense.
But in so many of my conversations with talent and other content creators who have found themselves “on the beach” or “between opportunities,” the road back can be a rough one.
On the one hand, reinvention is difficult no matter the age. And acquiring new skills can be an arduous task. Clearly, the digital tsunami has been that true game-changer, forcing talent from all radio departments to reassess their capabilities and repertoires.
But perhaps the biggest challenge facing talent and programmers trying to get “back in” revolves around shifting local management and corporate priorities. And sometimes, you get the feeling the people in the corner offices are grappling with the optimal traits and attributes they’re looking for in this next generation of staffers.
So, as part of the “DJs” presentation, I urge programmers and managers to give serious thinking when one of those staff openings materializes. There are fewer of them, and so hiring and evaluating become even more critical to the process.
And that requires prioritizing what is truly important for that next hire – especially on the talent side. Here was my example:
This “new” ad was written years ago now, but you can see where I was headed. There’s very little resemblance between it, and that original R&R mockup. And that’s the point.
Times change. Priorities shift.
As a programmer hiring my share of air talent, I never once asked about the ability to make a great sales experience or writing skills, among other things. And in looking over this “new” ad, it has already become dated – social “networks” and the term “on-line” are easy tipoffs.
So, what would a 2021 ad for air talent look like? What skills are most desirable now, as we prepare for radio life after the pandemic.
Part of the answer may be evident in a recent ad Z100 ran that captured the attention of the AllAccess team. That’s because it doesn’t look or read like “help wanted” radio ads of even the past few years:
The ad screams engagement, interaction, and pop culture savvy. Conversely, there’s not a word about “pipes.” The word “radio” doesn’t appear in the ad, nor does “broadcasting.”
The guy who sent the ad to me is Jeff Rowe, former radio programmer (nee Dallas Cole) who made the leap to television in the ’80s at Vh1 and later with NBC-TV – and never looked back. Jeff’s most recent project is producing the new documentary, Rock Camp, featuring music impresario David Fishof. These days, Jeff has a foot back in radio, providing NPR (among others) with consulting focused on programming, performance, and presentation.
Jeff’s combined skills in television and radio at some of the highest levels provide him with a unique perspective. And when he sent me that Z100 ad, he included this observation:
“When I saw this Z100 post on AllAccess regarding what they were looking for in a new host I thought, this is the most unique and different job description for a radio host that I’ve seen in years.”
And he followed with this observation that I’ve been thinking about these past few days, especially in my regular conversations with station management teams trying to navigate very challenging waters:
“We need to ask, what are the attributes of the modern…radio host?”
And that’s true for the entire spectrum of talent – in the myriad commercial radio formats, as well as public radio (where Jeff is obsessing this question), Christian radio, and everything in between.
As radio broadcasters vie for consumer attention in an expanding ecosystem of streaming, satellite-delivered programming, podcasts, and syndicated shows, what is the role of local talent? That question becomes even more poignant when you consider how many radio stations in the coming years will only have one or two on-site content people. Defining their job duties and their performance measures will be of paramount importance.
Many radio companies are still hiring and rewarding talent with anachronistic practices, making the old R&R ad not as dated as it should be. Stations still dangle ratings bonuses, even though measurement and other evaluative metrics are outmoded and less relevant today than ever.
If the radio industry is going to narrow its focus, hire fewer people, and raise the bar on future hires, that’s reality in 2021. But it becomes even more mission critical that hiring criteria and desirable skills are clear and well-defined.
In many of my conversations with displaced talent, I continue to hear the question, “What are they looking for?” Or does my resume match up with current hiring priorities?
There was something very comforting about those old ads in R&R. You knew what “they” wanted.
Tapes and resumes only.
No calls.
- Why Isn’t Mascot Mania Sweeping Radio? - October 3, 2024
- Managing From The Brink Of Bankruptcy - October 2, 2024
- The Perilous Price Of Politics - October 1, 2024
Rob Bennett says
Damn… I only signed up to lay here and play records! Ahh for the days of cue-burn just once more. After seeing razor blade in your ad … I am happy that we no longer have to dig through a garbage can full of tape to find the magic discarded piece. I guess as we progress there is good and bad.
Onward and Upward!
John Ford says
Well, there’s your new format. “Cue Burn 105.1” No social media, no digital music, just analog/all records/all the time with real DJ’s who talk to you, one to one without all the annoying Twitter and Facebook chatter.
Fred Jacobs says
I’m hoping there will be a rack of cart machines in the studio?
James VanOsdol says
Between this blog entry and the Facebook post promoting it, I’m surprised that all the comments were nostalgic looks back at the “good old days,” with no discussion of the existential threat facing talent, as spelled out in the piece.
This post is an essential read for current and prospective radio employees. Talent worried about their resumes are already too late; their digital footprint *is* their resume.
Fred Jacobs says
James, I was hoping the nostalgia of seeing the old ad wouldn’t overwhelm the content. Thanks for reading it, and I appreciate your comment.
Bob Bellin says
Couldn’t that ad have said, “if your goal is to follow, not lead, you excel at creating compelling content for your media competitors and would enjoy leveraging your listener base for them for free while simultaneously enabling China’s collection of their personal data and media habits, this might be the gig for you”.
Is there really not one radio operator that thinks their job is to create content that’s so good that their listeners will make if viral, rather than serving it up as just another social influencer among too many? I still think that radio’s best path is to be the antithesis of what this ad describes, not an also ran hanging on to the coat tails of its competition.
About ghost repeaters – Jeffrey Foucault wrote a song about networked Christian stations broadcasting a single canned message on all of its stations and the impact of that on people in real spiritual crisis. its a scary message and begs the question, has radio become one big ghost repeater and if so, to what end?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vzSBJwlfhg0
Fred Jacobs says
Bob, you always give us our money’s worth. Appreciate the comment.
Curt Krafft says
Excellent article. My bottom line opinion is this. When someone is behind the wheel driving their car someplace and they turn on the radio, what exactly will they be looking for? Clue: This is not a trick question. They will be looking for either their favorite music to listen to or their favorite talk or news station to listen to. Nobody sits in that car and thinks “Gee, I wonder what station out there has the best creative content? I wonder which air personality knows how to produce the absolute best video on You Tube or Tik Tok? I wonder if this air personality will let me buy them a drink in a bar? Oh, wait. I don’t drink. (PAUSE) NO! NO! Nobody turning on their “listening device” will give a damn about any of that. No listener thinks those things. They just want to hear what they like. And if they don’t, they will go somewhere else. PERIOD!
David Manzi says
This might be my age showing but, while I see value in having a plethora of “besides-radio” skills these days, I think you’re pretty much on the mark, Curt. I just can’t fathom masses of Tik Tok users thinking, “Oh, if there were only a radio station where I could listen to this guy” or an average listener driving around thinking, “Gosh, this guy is interesting and engaging but I just can’t see havng drinks with him–I wonder what else is on?”
I wonder how many truly great, compelling, exceptional air personalities–who’s only curse (apparently) is having “big pipes”–who could deliver huge numbers for Z-100 would never even be considered for the opening given the job listing…assuming they weren’t scared off by the ad and even bothered applying.
In short, I wonder how many people who could give Z-100 what they NEED will never be even be considered because they’re not what Z-100 is LOOKING for?
I also wonder how many other Z-100’s are out there, bypassing some extraordinary talent.
Fred Jacobs says
David, I appreciate this perspective. And I think you make salient points. The problem….
…is that while radio had “specialists” in the past – a music director, a public affairs director, a promotion director, a news director – the list goes on – there are just a handful of people around who can fulfill these multiple needs. If social media, websites, and mobile/smart speakers had existed in 1980, many stations would’ve had a dedicated person for each of those areas of expertise.
In thinking about the Z100 ad, you could read it that they’re looking for people with Swiss Army Knife skillsets OR people who can fill in the blanks caused by atrophying staffs.
David Manzi says
Can’t argue with any of that, Fred. It’s a tightrope radio is walking for sure, trying to meet the needs of both the changing demands and the makeup of its audience–all while being clairvoyant about what’s around the next corner.
Fred Jacobs says
It’s a heavy lift, to be sure. And it goes right to the core of the iHeart story where they’re splitting operations.
Fred Jacobs says
Curt, there is something to be said for the simplicity of just giving the people what they want. Thanks for cutting through the crap.
Michael Clark says
I find immense amusement from columns such as this one, especially the comments, as it brings out the fire breathing monster in all the radio traditionalists. I am 51 and remember what I perceive to be the “good ol’ days” of radio, too. However, I am young enough to understand the broadcast industry is changing. No needing fighting it. Embrace it. Figure out how to compete and remain relevant or get left behind. It’s that simple. In another decade, the “connected car” will drastically change the way people think about listening to the radio when driving. In fact, it might be quite difficult to actually find the “radio” in another ten years on most dash “infotainment systems” as they are being called. It’s no longer just about the jock or the music. It’s about “content”, which is increasingly coming in all shapes and sizes these days.
Radio is no different than many other industries. It’s changing and human beings just don’t like change after a certain age. It’s a fact. Those of us in it had better learn to adapt to a new reality – to new skillsets. This ain’t our Dad’s radio station any more!
Fred Jacobs says
No, it’s not. Michael, I hosted a webinar yesterday with RAB that was a walk-thru of CES 2021. We spent a lot of time staring at new dashboards, questioning the future of radio’s historical front & center location. Those days are coming to an end, and your last line sums it up well. Thanks for the comment.