Wait…what? It’s Thursday already. And that means it’s time to rummage through 16 years of archives to pick out a post that both was well-read and still makes sense.
This post was published a bit more than two years ago – well before the COVID nightmare began It tackles some of the many challenges facing radio broadcasters during the modern era.
As we know all too well, during these past few years, there’s been no shortage of pot shots taken at radio companies and the executives that are chosen to run them. They’re easy targets.
It’s not easy to steward a company – much less an industry – during times of all-out disruption. Leading radio companies in the ’80s and ’90s were a walk in the park – with all due respect to the corporate execs back then – compared to the competitive environment in recent years.
Radio broadcasters are beset by content and distribution challenges, as well as financial pressures that just weren’t anywhere near as intense back then.
But the biggest issue facing radio? Well, it’s right out of a “Pogo” comic strip. – FJ
Jacobs Media is fortunate to engage in many high-level meetings, private talks, brainstorms, retreats, and strategy sessions with radio broadcasting leadership. Whether it’s CEOs, station owners, or the heads of organizations, Paul and I have heard more than an earful these past few years as the industry hits an obvious inflection point.
No, I will not betray any confidences in this post. That’s because many of you know what I know about broadcast radio’s mounting challenges. They are many, and they require ongoing investment in both financial and human resources. But they also require strong wills, courageous leadership, and vision. And my worry is that’s where radio broadcasters may come up short.
That sounds like a major criticism of the head honchos of the radio business – but it’s not. Because what lies ahead is an ocean of uncertainty with no guarantees of success. Perhaps with the exception of the invasion of television in the 1950s, there’s never been a period in radio that will test the wills and wits of CEOs like this one.
So, what is the biggest speed bump facing radio at this moment in time? What is that radio leadership needs to focus on in order to move the business forward?
You may think I’m talking about devising the ultimate podcasting strategy. Or that streaming strategy that will solve both the content and monetization puzzles. Or the road map that transforms legacy companies into media juggernauts prepared to take on an uncertain future. Or a master plan to attract legions of young Gen Zers to broadcast radio.
But instead, I’m thinking about the radio industry’s continued inability to “speak in one voice.”
Back in 2011, I first saw James Cridland speak at a Radio Ink “Convergence” conference. Credit to Eric Rhoads for bringing James to the States to deliver an important message about radio around the globe versus what he was seeing here on the American front.
James’ world view was especially interesting to me, as my entire radio history is essentially confined to American radio. James talked about the challenges U.S. radio broadcasters faced in reaching consensus about key issues affecting the industry’s future. And he noted how many CEOs simply couldn’t get on the same page to solve common problems.
Here we are eight years later, and nothing’s really changed.
You could see the fruits of division in the NAB’s recent disagreement with those who don’t support the latest round of deregulation. Bob Pittman is the most visible opposition, and each side publicly made their feelings known a couple weeks back. It wasn’t pretty.
I don’t know enough about the legislative, regulatory, and lobbying process, but it’s obvious that once again, the big power brokers in radio are not singing out of the same hymnal.
I’m not taking sides on this issue or others. Because it’s not about where any of us stands on deregulation, whether you think it’s necessary for radio’s survival or you believe it’s the scourge that will hasten radio’s demise. What matters is that broadcasters need to come together on the big issues they face, and form a united front.
Clearly, one of the NAB’s top goals these past few years – starting right at the top with Gordon Smith – has been to connect with and learn from automakers. Radio and cars – peanut butter and jelly industries – have been inextricably intertwined for nearly a century in our culture. Yet, the two businesses have had little to do with one another, despite their commonalities all these years – until recently.
From my vantage point, I can tell you there is a lot of evidence suggesting radio broadcasters have done an impressive job networking with automakers. But when it comes to learning from them, not so much.
Over the many months and even years, I’ve heard many radio executives stress their stated belief that “the enemy” isn’t one another, but the digital predators chasing their valuable slices of the listening and revenue pies.
But their actions speak louder than their words. When you look at what’s happening in the corporate conference rooms and on the ground in local markets, radio continues to eat its own, rather than pull together to face common opponents and problems.
Interestingly, the automakers have made similar mistakes, and their results should act not as a cautionary tale, but as a cautionary anthology of what not to do during times of frantic, unprecedented disruption.
Consider…
Each auto company independently developed their own dashboard ecosystems, because each was smarter than the other. And the result? None of them was especially good, consumers were confused and frustrated, and the user experience was, at best, mediocre. And that environment is what let Apple and Google in the door with their CarPlay and Android Auto platforms. Does anyone think the automakers were thrilled about losing their dashboard branding to a couple of tech companies?
But the interfaces offered by both tech juggernauts were superior to what most automakers had developed. They were more familiar, easier to use, and their voice recognition abilities were better. They also leveraged the popularity of consumers’ smartphones.
And in just a few short months, most of the car companies folded like a line of cheap tents by offering both Apple CarPlay and Android Auto in their vehicles. Toyota, the lone holdout, finally caved last year.
So, it makes you wonder why the automakers can’t find a way to work together on the truly big stuff – the big boulders that stifle their already challenged industry. Instead, most are unilaterally investing billions of dollars in autonomous and electric cars, many chasing their own proprietary solutions.
On top of that, each has their own data strategy, and all are pouring massive human and financial resources into figuring how to deploy and monetize their mountains of numbers and analytics.
And don’t think for a moment the auto industry is any more stable or any less disrupted than radio. The automakers are currently freaking out over tariffs – and for good reason. As a share of its overall economy, the state most impacted by the current dust-up with Mexico is Michigan – home of the auto industry. The Great Lakes state imports more than $56 billion of goods from our neighbor to the south. China is another story.
But the angst in the auto industry goes beyond the current political rock and roiling. In just the last few weeks, Ford announced a series of massive layoffs. Fiat Chrysler made its plan public to merge with Renault – and just days later, they reversed course and pulled out of the deal. A story came out just the other day, suggesting the possibility of a merger between Ford and GM is getting stronger. How’s that for tumult and instability?
Then there’s the pressure coming from the automotive disruptors – and just like in radio, they are many and growing in popularity. App buying 
services like Carvana, TrueCar, and CarMax continue to siphon dollars away from dealerships. Tesla is constantly putting pressure on the legacy automakers with its brash innovativeness. And of course, services like Uber, Lyft, and ride sharing programs are reminders that car ownership isn’t for everyone – especially that bulge of the population we call Gen Z who should be in a hurry to get their drivers licenses – but aren’t.
Back at the DASH Conference in 2015, we presented a panel of regional car dealers, each of whom told the story of their changing industry, and how it was impacting their local businesses. Wes Lutz owns Extreme Dodge/Chrysler/Jeep/Ram in Jackson, Michigan. He was recently president of the National Automobile Dealers Association, and still serves on their board. This is a guy with great perspective on both the local and national fronts.
He joined other dealers in a discussion called “Training Consumers To Use Their Connected Cars.” But the conversation quickly turned to media buying and marketing priorities at the dealership level. And all the execs on stage talked about how more “accountable” digital media were rapidly becoming their new go-to advertising choices, while traditional media – like radio – were being diminished. They explained to the broadcasters in the room that radio will need to be more committed and creative when it comes to digital integration if it wishes to stay competitive for auto dollars.
And that’s when Lutz looked the audience right in the eye, and reminded them his industry was experiencing the very same unsettling feeling of disruption and change as radio owners do. And he empathetically pointed out the obvious truth:
“Look, when it comes to disruption, we are just like you.”
It was a moment of shared frustration with the challenging times in which most industries live – certainly, local radio and local car dealerships.
And yet, the OEMs – the car manufacturers – continue to often go their own way, despite the obvious need to face disruption with a more united front. When you talk to those in positions of leadership in the car community, they’ll readily tell just how disrupted their business has become. And then they go right back to their familiar, insular ways of doing business.
So, now that we’ve gotten to know them better, are radio broadcasters learning anything from the lack of unity consistently displayed by the auto industry? Nearly, every step of the way, radio’s leaders continue down their tribal paths, often to their own and their industry’s detriment. Unlike in the UK and other countries, American broadcasters don’t use uniform streaming players or apps. And on the local level, radio broadcasters spend more time mudslinging against one another than they do combating true rivals like Facebook, Google, and SiriusXM.
In this current challenge radio faces revolving around the future of the car, the NAB is the leadership organization that has made a genuine effort to connect with 
automakers, consortia, and outside innovators.
Similarly, iHeartMedia/iHeartRadio have been especially forward-thinking when it comes to the dashboard, as has NPR on the public radio side. Both organizations – in spite of their obvious differences – perceived the need to ensure their respective content would be available in cars – not just in the tuner but with apps available on millions of touchscreens in hundreds of different makes and models.
In spite of everyone’s best individual efforts, radio broadcasters would be exponentially better off if they represented themselves to the car companies as a platform – not as a collection of disparate companies, loosely gathered like a pack of cats under an umbrella that read “RADIO.”
That’s because the Rubik’s Cube that is today’s – and tomorrow’s – auto industry is part of a complex dance that demands research, partnerships, and an innovative spirit. For the NAB and ultimately radio as a whole to be effective, both the industry’s biggest and smallest players need to unify – yes, speak with one voice, as Mr. Cridland advises.
The good news is that most people in the auto industry have a healthy respect for radio. They’ve all grown up with the medium, and many continue to listen today. But they’re also fighting for the future of their business. And they’re trying to figure out what that looks like.
When radio broadcasters are all over the map, it’s easier for the automakers to look past those squabbles to focus on initiatives where they can make some progress.
When radio’s leadership puts aside their considerable differences, drop their grudges, and see the bigger picture, the industry will be in a much better position to negotiate, collaborate, and contribute with the automakers.
Until then, it’s just like herding cats.
Jacobs Media has consistently walked the walk in the digital space, providing insights and guidance through its well-read national Techsurveys.
In 2008, jacapps was launched - a mobile apps company that has designed and built more than 1,300 apps for both the Apple and Android platforms. In 2013, the DASH Conference was created - a mashup of radio and automotive, designed to foster better understanding of the "connected car" and its impact.
Along with providing the creative and intellectual direction for the company, Fred consults many of Jacobs Media's commercial and public radio clients, in addition to media brands looking to thrive in the rapidly changing tech environment.
Fred was inducted into the Radio Hall of Fame in 2018.
- When Did Radio Stop Advertising? - December 27, 2024
- Radio Listeners Don’t Get Tired Of Music, Only PDs And Music Directors Do - December 26, 2024
- It’s The Most Wonderful Time Of The Year - December 25, 2024
Sorry, no filter today – I just said goodbye to my 15 year old dog.
I’ve never agreed that unanimity of message was critical to radio’s ticket out of its slide – I’ve always believed investment and innovation was. Delivery isn’t the problem – cars still have radios and if people wanted them in their homes, they’d have them. If people wanted them in their homes, smart speakers would have them.
I would also argue that radio has spoken with one voice. Not deliberately, but almost everyone has done the same thing independently – the equivalent of reacting to facing Tom Brady in the super bowl by doing the following: firing their best players and replacing them with cheaper ones. Eliminating some of the positions – deciding that linebackers could double as defensive ends and that long snappers were unnecessary – place kickers could just get the ball, walk it back ten years or so, hand it to the holder then kick it. Then consolidating their coaching staff and have the quarterback coach also coach the free safeties and set up a job sharing system, so coaches would not only no longer have specialties, they’d coach multiple teams.
This isn’t even an exaggeration – its exactly what they did as a reaction to the fiercest competition in their lifetimes. Sure its easy to take potshots, but they’re such easy targets. And yes, the 80s-90s was a much easier environment, but I seriously doubt that Jimmy d, Bob Neil or Clarke Brown would be doing this if they were in charge. Back then, radio’s best operators responded to competition with better talent, marketing and research. More competition doesn’t make that less likely to work, it makes it more essential.
So is one loud idiot a better networking strategy rather than a bunch of individual quieter ones? I don’t think it matters. In the auto industry’s case, despite ceding the dash to Apple and Google, they’re making better and better cars and people want them. Yes, they lost the opportunity to sell the dash data, but that won’t bring down the sector. Today’s cars are good products that are in demand.
Radios will be in new car dashboards as long as people want them. If at some point, they don’t, they’ll be gone. Radio – pay attention, this is how its supposed to work. Rather than speak with one voice, radio should STFU and fix its product while people still care.
Amen.
I’m sorry for the loss of your beloved dog, Bob. Never easy. As for the post, yes, I’ll second that “amen” from Dick. Best line in my opinion was, “More competition doesn’t make that (the need for better talent, marketing and research) less likely to work, it makes it more essential.” From your keyboard to radio management’s corner offices, Bob.
Sad about your canine companion, Bob. Fired up with the rest of your comments because you couldn’t be closer to the truth of the matter. Thanks for sharing.
First and foremost, Bob, condolences on your friend. I’ve experienced this, and it’s devastating.
Onto your comment, I share your concerns about the car, and as you know, Jacobs Media has been in the vanguard of those conversations. For a century, the OEMs (car manufacturers) have graciously included our receivers in their dashboard at NO CHARGE, allowing radio to monetize the car. We have been very fortunate as an industry.
But a look at Elon Musk and what he’s NOT including in Tesla center stacks should be proof aplenty that radio broadcasters need a smart automotive strategy, now more than ever. Radio needs to sound better, be more present (ie. local), and look better in the dash or that prediction you make will become a reality.
Fred, one comment in this post is very accurate, but pretty scary.
“The good news is that most people in the auto industry have a healthy respect for radio. They’ve all grown up with the medium, and many continue to listen today.”
That won’t always be the case. The guy who cut my hair yesterday, when told of my association with the local PBS station asked “is that CBS”? Obviously a millennial who knows streaming, smart speakers and Spotify, but broadcast media is a foreign language to him. Once the auto industry sees the people who’ve “grown up with the medium” retire, the replacements will most likely be totally unfamiliar with transmitters and towers unless the legacy medium gets with the 21st Century.