Congratulations to the Jacksonville Jaguars. In the NFL Draft that started last night, they made their long-awaited top pick, choosing highly-regarded Georgia defensive end Travon Walker.
(My Detroit Lions selected next, ending up with the player they likely wanted anyway, hometown hero Aidan Hutchinson from Michigan.)
Will the Jags look back at this apogee moment as a turning point in their franchise’s trajectory? Probably not.
In a great column in The New York Times earlier this week, Dave Leonhardt reminds us of “The power of humility.” That is, despite all the data, conjecture, and punditry, teams often get it wrong.
The classic case everyone points to, of course, is Tom Brady, the 199th pick of the 2000 NFL Draft. Brady was passed over by every NFL team – several times. And he’s only the G.O.A.T.
On the other hand, many can’t miss draftees have…well, missed. In case after case, badly. Some teams – hey, those are my Lions – have botched first round picks so often, they’ve earned a well-deserved reputation for blowing it.
Just like us employers do when it’s time to hire that morning show or sales manager or digital director.
Leonhardt blames the tendency to get it wrong, despite our confidence we know full well what we’re doing, as good old hubris – better known as excessive pride. Or in Greek tragedy, “defiance of the gods.”
We do it in radio all the time.
We just know what new formats, stations, songs, and shows will be hits and which will be stiffs. Until we don’t.
How many of us truly get it right before Nielsen delivers the news? It is only in retrospect that we attempt to explain what happened.
Those guys must be doing stealth marketing.
There were blizzards that week which always helps them.
I heard they did a music test.
Their morning show has been sounding good.
They always have a great spring book.
As Leonhardt reminds, “Predicting performance is unavoidably hard.”
If you watch CNBC, that’s an ongoing theme. As a viewer you often feel stupid, having missed an obvious trend – Tesla getting killed, Apple skyrocketing, or real estate hitting a bubble.
Of course, we all knew that. Until we didn’t.
To some extent, that’s been the story of the last two years of COVID. Leonhart points to hubris as the reason that despite health experts and their data, truth continued to shift and change, often by the day.
Like so many of us, they tried to make sense out of spikes and plateaus, often getting it horribly wrong. Of course, most of the politicians who took matters in their own hands didn’t get it so right either.
You’ll be happy to know that I got it right…er, wrong back on March 6, 2020 – just before all hell officially broke loose with COVID. The post, “What’s your prediction about radio?” used a story about Amazon working on an algorithm designed to predict the future. (Ha ha.)
Looking back I correctly nailed the truth that none of the experts – or any of us for that matter – had an inkling of what was going on and what was to transpire. The last 26 months prove it beyond a shadow of a doubt. I used the crystal ball illustration to make my point. It holds up just fine today.
At the time, I quoted one of my all-time favorite authors, William Goldman:
“Nobody knows anything.”
Columnist Leonhardt suggests even Goldman doesn’t have it exactly right. Scouts, recruiters, and statisticians have insights that are often useful. And sometimes, they actually get it right.
Maybe, just maybe, the Jags and the Lions will look back on yesterday and smile. But it’s just as likely they won’t.
The problem comes when our hubris takes over, causing us to be too confident in our abilities to see what’s coming, whether we’re the CEO, the PD, a consultant, or (gulp!) a futurist.
Here’s the way I concluded that blog post on the cusp of the pandemic, the lockdowns, and the tragedy that played out:
“We can’t predict the future. No one can.
But we can control the controllables.
Be of service to your audience, the people you manage, and the people who manage you.
Know your purpose, stay in your lane, do your job, serve your community.
I wish Amazon all the luck in the world on the development of their prediction algorithm.
Want to know my prediction?
All bets are off.
We will get through this, but there will be winners and losers.
There are stories that will be written about this year. These times. This situation.
Let’s write the next chapter of our radio story in 2020.”
See, I was right.
Er…wrong.
Special thanks to perhaps the smartest guy I ever got to work with, Tom Bender, for sending me this story. – FJ
- Old Man, Take A Look At My Ratings - December 20, 2024
- In The World Of On-Demand Audio, How Do We Define Success? - December 19, 2024
- Scenes From The Classic Rock Highway – 2024 Edition - December 18, 2024
Barry Drake says
Continuing with your football analogy, this is what’s made Bill Belichick the best over the past couple of decades…He’s smart enough to know he doesn’t know how a player might perform in the future and then never asks a player to do something the player hasn’t demonstrated he is capable of. Works pretty well most of the time.
Fred Jacobs says
Indeed it has. And I expect he will find a way to win again, most likely using players underestimated by the rest of the league. Thanks, Barry.
Marty Bender says
As I’m typing this…
Amazon stock is down about 350
(But they probably knew that would happen)
Fred Jacobs says
Of course, they did. (And Amazon closed down more than 400 points. But you knew that.)
John Covell says
Others have said it well:
“It is very difficult to make predictions, particularly about the future.” ~ Niels Bohr
“The best way to predict the future is to create it.” ~ Peter Drucker
“The challenge is to learn … to examine our present by the eerie light cast by the onrushing future.” ~ David Farrier
“We may have knowledge of the past but cannot control it; we may control the future but have no knowledge of it.” ~ Claude Shannon
My favorite:
“The future is already here, it’s just not evenly distributed.” ~ Wm. Gibson
David Manzi says
These are great, John! Thanks for sharing. I’ve already started sharing them with others!
Fred Jacobs says
Love these, John, especially the Niels Bohr.
My favorite? Yogi Berra: “The future ain’t what it used to be.”
CLARK SMIDT says
Broadcasters can control Content, Cost and Presentation to create immediate turnarounds. Past performance applies to the present. Why waste money and leave dollars on table, chasing windmills? May all boats, formats and bottom lines rise!
Fred Jacobs says
I’m all about rising boats, Clark. Beats the alternative.
Mike N. says
Continuing with the football analogy and tagging off of Barry’s Patriot reference, in football, the smarter play is to trade down and get as many picks as you can to amortize your bets. Besides fielding big teams, the NFL has always treated its employees as disposable (and its fans with contempt, but that is another story). That is exactly what the Patriots do.
In Basketball (smaller rosters), it matters where you pick because the NBA is a star league. Getting Patrick Ewing as the first pick ushered in a decade plus of excitement in NY and we know what getting Michael Jordan with the third pick did for Chicago. You could make a case that picking Sam Bowie ahead of him wouldn’t be that infamous if he wasn’t injured and, to go along with your theme, no one can predict that. There are less pure misses on lottery talent outside of injuries and the occasional Anthony Bennett.
Trading a lottery pick for pick 25 and a second rounder doesn’t usually work out in the NBA.
Radio is in the entertainment business so we are a star league as well. I think it is easier to see who has talent but the problem is Neilsen is an unreliable barometer – especially in diary markets – and we lack the patience to let a show grow. We’ve also slashed marketing budgets to the bone as well.
You’re right – no one knows anything and I’m a Giant fan who thought picking Eli Manning was too risky. But we all have ears and I’m sure your track record on spotting talent is better than the Jets record on drafting prospects.
Fred Jacobs says
Mike, I would hope so. And for a change, I like the Lions’ first round results. Which means they will probably underperform. Thanks for commenting.