I would love to see HD Radio work. I really would.
But in order to “break” a new medium/gadget in this new millennium, it’s going to take clever tactics, brilliant strategy, and on-target execution. These are qualities that have been in short supply since the Alliance was formed. Another Christmas comes and goes, and the celebration over a half million radios sold is about as meaningless as a big defensive lineman celebrating after a sack in a game his team is losing by five touchdowns.
And the newest campaign that evidently launches on Alliance stations on New Year’s Eve – and set to run for all of first quarter – stunned me. You can go to the HD Radio Alliance web page, and check it out for yourself. Just click “Commercials“ from the home page, scroll down to “Click On Your Contract Name” and sample the 10 different spots they have posted. Or, if you’re an Alliance station, walk down to your Traffic department and take a listen.
In a sort of snarky approach, the campaign features a humanized radio talking to his owner about why HD Radio product is so attractive and not worth the bother. But in the process, traditional radio is repositioned as old-fashioned, repetitive, and lame.
Why does the Alliance feel they have to market HD Radio by selling against AM/FM Radio? (Of course, those are the same stations that are expected to invest millions of dollars of their precious air time running these commercials.) On top of that, it’s questionable whether this campaign clearly extols the benefits of HD Radio, especially to those who are already confused. You have to hear these commercials a few times before you really get a basic understanding of what they’re trying to accomplish, while they throw AM/FM Radio under the bus.
Why isn’t HD Radio positioning against the subscription model of satellite radio or the 99 cents a song iPod? That would make sense because HD Radio could potentially be postioning its variety and free attributes. Instead, like everyone else these days, these ads take shots at traditional AM/FM broadcast radio. If I heard David Rehr‘s “2020” initiative correctly, I thought it was all about combatting trash talking radio, and being proud of what the medium has to offer.
Hopefully, Alliance stations will hear these commercials, just say “no,” and go with last year’s campaign. Or perhaps they can do better on their own.
Listen to them yourself and tell me I’m wrong.
Jacobs Media has consistently walked the walk in the digital space, providing insights and guidance through its well-read national Techsurveys.
In 2008, jacapps was launched - a mobile apps company that has designed and built more than 1,300 apps for both the Apple and Android platforms. In 2013, the DASH Conference was created - a mashup of radio and automotive, designed to foster better understanding of the "connected car" and its impact.
Along with providing the creative and intellectual direction for the company, Fred consults many of Jacobs Media's commercial and public radio clients, in addition to media brands looking to thrive in the rapidly changing tech environment.
Fred was inducted into the Radio Hall of Fame in 2018.
- Baby, Please Don’t Go - November 22, 2024
- Why Radio Needs To Stop Chasing The Puck - November 21, 2024
- Great Radio – In The Niche Of Time? - November 20, 2024
Fred,
Agree with your take. Peter Ferrara should do the right thing and put this new creative on hold. We need a time out for a candid and serious industry conversation. This new creative will not get the job done, it’s not going to sell more radios or advance with any significance the adoption of HD Radio.
Thanks so much for the comments, Dave. And your blog makes some great points, too. https://davemartin.blogspot.com/
HD Radio jams our broadcast bands and is a giveaway to iBiquity and the HD Alliance:
https://hdradiofarce.blogspot.com/
“DEAD AIR: Radio’s great leap forward stalling in the Valley”
“Retailers say no one is buying HD radios in South Texas despite scattered attempts by broadcasters to promote the digital signal technology…”
https://www.themonitor.com/news/radio_7098___article.html/digital_new.html
“HD Radio Has Yet To Take Off”
“But the technology hasn’t taken off as expected. NBC 5 could not find one person who owns a hi-def radio and neither could KISS FM’s program director. I don’t know anybody that has one yet, Davis said.”
https://www.nbc5i.com/technology/14878368/detail.html
Yea, they are selling a zillion HD radios!
Sooo…HD sucks and radio is all you need? Or was that radio sucks and you need to have HD? Or is it these are such confusing spots no one will understand them?
The correct answer – all 3.
Why aren’t we concentrating on the product FIRST?
Give the consumer a REASON to pay money for these HD radios. Commercial free (at least for now) you say? So what….I can find you a half-dozen sources where a consumer can get commercial free music. Let’s take away at least one lesson from Satellite radio…they did…in most cases… provide compelling formats and PERSONALITIES.
Or how about a lesson from Starbucks. They actually got people to (at least ocassionally) change a habit of grabbing a cup of coffee at the gas station or local McDonald’s and visiting their stores for the priviledge of paying MORE for what was percieved as a QUALITY product.
The answer is COMPELLING PROGRAMMING.
BTW, compelling means more than just a deep playlist.
SOMEBODY MAKE IT STOP!….I am rarely amazed at the lack of common sense radio people have from time to time but the HD spots leave be stunned. I doubt that many owners and operators would like to kill their cash cows to further the HD cause. Here is an idea…Why not try a positive approach outlining the benefits of HD as compared to Satellite or Internet radio. In my experience people have always responded to “FREE.” Or, How About checking with some Pro-Radio people before they launch a new campaign to take a direct shot at the business that pays the bills.
Fred,
Just listened to the spots. You are on the money. And they are confusing even if you understand them.
Happy Holidays!
Joel
Fred (an all) –
We’re sorry you didn’t enjoy the spots. We are working with an one of the top brand building ad agencies in the country that’s done great things for clients like Southwest Airlines, BMW, MasterCard, AT&T and the PGA Tour. We explained our challenge, the current status of HD Radio and asked them for their honest evaluation and recommendation.
It’s completely natural for all of us in the radio business to bristle at the thought that not everyone shares our passion and commitment to our medium. The truth is that these spots aren’t aimed at you and me – and we need to have the courage to engage the folks we’re trying to reach in a way that speaks to the way they see it. And when we connect with them on that, authentic level, we can hope to re-engage them in what’s outstanding about radio.
In the meantime, all of us in radio’s inner circle have an opportunity to trust in the experience and the track record of an ad agency that’s been here before.
Peter,
You’re being intellectually dishonest to wit: SW, BMW, MC and AT&T were established brands long before the engagement of your unnamed agency; the proper qualification needed would seem to be a proven track record of successfully
launching new, previously unknown, brands in the marketplace – you have provided no such credential with your comment. I again respectfully request you do the right thing and put this creative on hold, take a time out, open a candid and serious discussion with the industry. Should you be right, should you and your agency have the research to prove this approach to be sound, to be the best possible creative needed to get the job done then share it. We can then all move forward together with the knowledge that we are, indeed, doing the right thing.
Late to the party. And now the spot downloads are password protected; so I cannot hear (waiting for the “bootlegs” to show up on the web).
That all said – where do the broadcasters in the HD Radio “Alliance” stand on these spots?
Just asking.
Peter, thanks for chiming in with your comments. I understand your defense of the campaign. But I think you need to understand that there’s no shortage of “deprecation” of radio out there. Our beleagured industry does not need self-inflicted criticism or even light-hearted taunting. Consumer perceptions that broadcast radio is lame, repetitive, or out of step was a major finding from the study the NAB commissioned earlier this year. For the Alliance to produce commercials that draws even more attention to radio’s shortcomings – even with humor – crosses the line. That’s why the Mac versus Windows commercials are so devastingly effective. One looks bad at the other’s expense – funny or not. How Alliance stations will react to running them on their own air, at their own expense, remains to be seen. I believe that everyone “gets” that in a crowded, fluid, fast-changing media environment, HD Radio is a tough putt. But to attempt to divide and separate Radio – AM/FM from HD – in an effort to make one look good at the expense of the other is a tactic that is more than a little questionable. If asked, I will advise my clients to write and produce commercials of their own, rather than run this campaign. I appreciate you – and the other commenters – taking the time to respond. If you decide to again make the commercials freely available so that everyone can hear them and judge for themselves, please let us know.
From Randy Kabrich – an article in USA Today earlier in the week about all things HD, including unscientific observations about HD Radio. “HD Stands for ‘Hot Dog!'”
https://www.usatoday.com/tech/products/2007-12-17-high-definition-holiday_N.htm?csp=34&POE=click-refer
Being a radio amateur, I live in the real world of radio, not in the ivory towers of the IBOC Alliance. Never mind these lousy commercials. IBOC is and was aways a lousy idea, it interferes with neighboring stations, has reduced range and just plain sounds bad on analog radio which in case anyone has forgotten here comprises 99.9999% of all radios in existence. It took colossal gall to think that a new system as bad as IBOC would come along and bulldoze radio listeners into buying a new expensive, insensitive piece of krap to receive an almost universally panned mode of broadcasting. You could give these things away door to door and they still wouldn’t be successful, you’d find them in the cellar next to the 8 track player. This technology has been a bigger lead balloon than the Edsel. It is the Titanic of our time.
I absolutely love it! Only the HD Alliance and Peter Ferrara could come up with a radio marketing strategy buying into public “deprecation” of radio. Sure, as long as we’re promoting a defective and outmoded technology, let’s actively participate in our own demise by presenting a negative self-image of radio! How about instead using common sense and courage and respecting the time-honored practice of promising a benefit to the consumer, instead of using critics’ weapons to publicly disparage ourselves? I can’t concur with Mr. Ferrara’s blind trust of the creative instincts of ad agencies. They’re hardly infallible. Anybody remember the rousing success of that swell Chrysler “Dr. Z” TV campaign??
IBOC is the biggest fizzle to ever hit. Technically it is a piece of cow puckey. The FM power penetrates only 1/3 of the analog signal, and for those who lock on, there is only a modest amount of audio improvement. HD Radio HAS SCREWED AM, putting the analog down to 3khz, killing skywave and DX. You have to be some 10 miles of a 50kw xmtr. to pick it up and the audio is tinny. GIVE ME CAM-D before I go crazy, not endless profit streams for Ibiquity and crappy reception. ANALOG FM processed right and CAM-D AM are king and the people have spoken. Stop KILLING the regular band with JUNK SCIENCE and CRAP. Yes, I’ve heard it, yes I work in radio management and HELL NO, I don’t want HD-Radio. If it ain’t broke, why fix it?
Does anyone at the HD Alliance realize that consumers no longer buy radios, but only occasionally, things with radios in them? Has anyone seen a “radio department” at Radio Shack, Best Buy, or the-like, in the last 10 – 15 years? The ONLY way HD Radio has a chance, as Mark Ramsey has pointed out, is to be forced transparently onto consumers and the auto industry, by terrestrial radio subsidizing iBiquity’s HD licensing and chipset fees – unfortunately, this would take faith in HD Radio and funds, which broadcasters do not have, with their stocks in penny-stock range, now. Trying to market an out-dated, technically flawed product is sheer-madness. Putting a new “spin” on HD Radio is NOT going to help – consumers have been bombarded with HD commercials for the past 1 1/2 years, but have voted “NO” with their wallets. Consumers are now laughing at the HD Radio commercials, so one can imagine my reaction. I have been DXing AM radio for 40 years, and never dreamed that a once-proud industry would stoop to selling this snake-oil product, as an attempt to prop-up a declining industry. Peter, this is a pathetic and sad day for the radio industry.
All ears on HD Radio’s new campaign
The new HD Radio spots you’re supposed to run for free are in. And Fred Jacobs has a great critique of them. I haven’t heard them yet, and I don’t need to. For a couple reasons. First, isn’t this topic
Peter Ferrera,
I would like to add, that not only is HD/IBOC destroying AM radio, but is now pitting AM broadcasters against each other with FCC interference complaints (e.g., WYSL vs WBZ); at some point in the past, broadcasters used to be cooperative, but now this cancer is destroying the very fabric of your industry. BTW, FM-HD has now been proven to cause adjacent-channel interference:
“What Are We Doing to Ourselves, Exactly?”
“IBOC FM Interference Has Been Reported in Several Cases Where FCC Contours Provide Inadequate Protection.”
https://tinyurl.com/yt286v
Kudos to the HD Alliance and iBiquity!
Peter’s comment reminds me of the line attributed to Groucho Marks “…who you gonna believe, me or your own eyes.” At a time when radio’s digital strategy includes betting its life on HD Radio, the Alliance is telling radio professionals “Who you gonna believe, our agency or your own ears.”
Where’s the logic? Where’s the emotion? (Sales is usually one , the other, or both.)
If it’s “what you listen to now sucks” then the goose is cooked. Quality difference is negligible to people who have run amok with mp3 data reduction sounding crappy through little cheap ear buds. Higher quality SACD failed with a high fidelity thud. Record companies hammer the crap out of new releases to make them loud with no dynamic range, no nuance, ambience, sucking the art out of the pitch corrected and beat-fixed tunes.
If it’s “better choices” you’ll need proof of a notable difference. Proof on the order of, oh, say, MTV when it launched, or even Saturday Night Live – stuff that people talked and cared about. I doubt that’s going to happen when the programmers are men and women who have other stations to ‘do’ and probably honestly don’t even buy into the concept.
A better alternative might be to strip HD from radio operators.
As for the SELLING of the receivers, a trip to the Austin FRYs some months ago offered impossible reception and no good reason to want one of these uncheap ‘radios’ – you know what? Their display was the ‘regular radio’ equivalent of a promotion intern sitting behind a card table draped in roll-a-banner at a “remote.” A.k.a.: boring!
HD at low bitstream rates is an audio delusion. HD radio as envisioned by the alliance is an illusion. What we need is a revolution.
Fred,
GREAT points! I couldn’t agree more.
The current campaign aside, the biggest problem HD faces, in my opinion, seems to be the lack of any real BENEFIT (perceived or otherwise) to the consumer. It’s pretty easy to explain the benefits of HD Radio’s competition…
* AM/FM – Free, everywhere
* iPod – MY Music, anytime and anywhere I want it
*XM/Sirius – Commercial free, variety, great programming (MLB, NBA, NFL, Fox Radio in the car, etc.)
What exactly are the benefits to HD radio?
(cue crickets sfx)
* Commercial free (for now)
* Formats that aren’t presently available in the market? (but in most places I can receive HD Radio, I can get those format via the Internet)
Not to mention, we’re asking people to spend $200 minimum for some clunky receiver that is far from portable (unlike the sat-rad models which all stress portability, i.e, the radios move from car to home to office.)
And let’s be honest, exactly how much time is being spent “programming” these HD-Radio channels?
A-hem.
HD-Radio is attmepting to launch a new platform with content that, pretty much blows. (Come on, you wanted to say it, too!)
You want to see HD-Radio equipment sales? How ’bout some good old fashioned KILLER CONTENT?!
How about some GREAT radio stations. GREAT formats with GREAT talent who are PASSIONATE about the music they play and the lifestyle they represent? Then, how about marketing THOSE STATIONS in their respective markets?
As presently programmed (with few exceptions) and marketed, HD-Radio is likely to end up the Edsel of the airwaves. Although, it could survive if the technology becomes ubiquitous (i.e., if/when HD-Radio is included with all new radios and in all new cars where listeners can “stumble upon” the programming transparently, and can sample it without weighing its value against a high cost.)
The other question is, if it does survive, will we someday shake our heads in disbelief at our lack of vision? Will our under-utlization and paltry programming efforts be compared to the opporunity operators missed with FM radio prior to the 1970s?
We marvel at stories of FM stations being “thrown in” with the sale of an AM. Some of us remember early FM programming consisting of a box in a corner…or a wire coming off the satellite, directly to the transmitter. Format 41, anyone? Or combos with fully staffed AM stations and zero FM employees. (Whoever was given the token title of Program Director didn’t even bother including it on their business card it was considered such a joke.) Many combos just simulcasted the AM station on the FM.
Is our current attitude toward programming our HD-2 properties another case of history repeating? Will our barebones jukebox mentality be treated any differently by history? Or will they laugh at us, too, sometime in the not too distant future?
Who knows.
One thing I do know, is that current HD-radio programming isn’t moving the needle on hardware sales. Despite a billion dollars in free advertising, nobody cares. We’re shoving this thing down people’s throats and they just aren’t swallowing it.
The real question seems to be, would great programming and subsequent marketing of those stations make a difference?
I’d like to see The Alliance market test the idea. Decide on a city/region. Come up with several viable formats and put WORLD CLASS PROGRAMMING on them. Treat them like 100,000 Watt FMs in NYC. Try to create the best radio stations in the world, regardless of delivery medium. We’re talking research, talent, contsts. SUPER-SERVE the market. And, finally, market the benefits of those stations to the target demos instead of selling the HD-Radio brand.
I’m not 100% convinced, but I think that approach has the best chance of working. Again, the cookie cutter, plain jane vanilla, format in a box, automation schemes aren’t attracting anybody.
Just my opinion–I’d love to hear thoughts on the matter!
Best,
Matthew L.A. Reid
http://www.RadioMatt.com
Matthew, great comments, and a great example of how it would be great if the Alliance tapped into some of the passionate radio people who would love to contribute to the initiative. You’ve come up with some solid thoughts, and – while I’m biased – Detroit would strike me as a great test market, by virtue of RIFF 2, a well-programmed HD2 station. This market has always responded to great radio, and personalties like Steve Dahl, Dick Purtan, Howard Stern, J.P. McCarthy, and Arthur Penhallow all either became famous here, or spent some of their formative years on the radio in the Motor City. Peter, if you’re still reading this thread – already more than 20 comments strong during a holiday weekend – we’d love to hear your thoughts.
FJ
Larry Langford in Radio World this week spoke volumes when he quoted his mentor on HD: “HD FM is junk science. HD AM is science fiction.’
HD cheerleaders are masterfully projective. They accuse AM/FM of being buggy whip technology. Do they realize, if anything’s lame, repetitive, and old fashioned, it’s the endlessly droned manipulative nonsense issuing from the HD bund?
HD? Here’s the juice:
Older consumers reject it.
Younger one’s laugh at it.
Manufacturers dislike it.
Retailers can’t sell it.
Paul Vincent Zecchino
Manasota Key, Florida
Unity, not infighting, best serves the radio industry
The voices of those shouting adapt-or-die to radio people in the turbulent, rapidly changing new media era are many; warning loudly and frequently to embrace whats ahead, not fear it. The words of these wise folks should be not onl…
When you are sailing in a boat built with your own two hands it is hard to admit you’re sinking.
Regardless of WHAT an ad agency creative type thinks (and let’s be honest, we know they generally think that iPods rock and Radio sucks) I doubt that pissing in our own cornflakes in order to get a fresh bowl is a good idea. Creativity without factual basis is simply junk.
The HD alliance has now aligned itself against non-HD alliance members.
If you assume (as the ad agency apparently is) that there is MUCH BETTER CONTENT on the other side of analog–on those HD channels–then maybe there is a kernal of a marketing plan there. But we all know that there is precious little compelling contant on any of the alliance member’s stations, many of which are barely programming anything past an automated jukebox of “all 80s” or other non-essential music. And the response from the public is likely to be nill.
Fred –
Ding! Ding! And may I add, Ding! Just as I still cringe when Station X tries to close a sale by saying Station Y stinks, throwing AM+FM under the bus to promote HD is simply the wrong way to market HD technology.
Any creative professional knows there are infinite ways to address, attack and solve a problem. Amongst those possibilities are countless ways to deliver the new baby without cursing its parents for conception.
I run one of America’s few “radio only” ad agencies. And for all the success we’ve had in helping national brands use the medium correctly, our batting average is less than 1.000. Hey, we’re only human.
If our agency received such an overwhelming pushback from the industry we were trying to promote, we’d be back in the studios today working to make it right. Period.
https://www.radiodirect.com/blog/
Perhaps the real challenge is to simply improve our terrestrial stations. But that’s been said before, what a boring suggestion, ho-hum…and it’s not as sexy as creating and bringing to market a NEW technology, simply because we can.
The consumer will be the ultimate judge, jury and executioner of HD Radio.
My personal belief is that they don’t really want it any more than I want 21 shopping channel choices on my 125-channel cable TV box. Research proves consumers only watch 15-20 TV channels with any regularity. And those same consumers likely only select 10-15 radio stations MAXIMUM to tune into each week. How much time are they spending with mine?
I believe that consumers are becoming paralyzed by (and numb to) the variety of choices available to them. Not just old people. Everyone. Fragmentation, the Long Tail, the Change Function, whatever you want to call it…
The majority of consumers simply don’t give a damn about what we think is so important. They just know what they like and like what they know. Same as it has always been.
My theory is based on toothpaste. If you are not Crest, you better be Colgate. And if you really want to live on the edge, maybe you choose to be Aquafresh. Nobody want to be Gleem. Unless being Gleem is enough for you.
I have nothing against new technology, or more choices for those who want it. But if we really think THE MAJORITY of people want a better product, then let’s simply GIVE them better content. Is it fair to say there is a lot of bland programming out there? Then it can also be said there is a lot of GREAT programming out there too.
My belief is that the real payoff is on our websites where we can offer new, exciting and different programming elements that will build our brands strength and keep us relevant to the ways consumers are using media these days.
“My belief is that the real payoff is on our websites where we can offer new, exciting and different programming elements that will build our brands strength and keep us relevant to the ways consumers are using media these days.”
With the new Internet Royalty Rates, who do you think is going to pay for streaming music?
Fred and all,
I have reason to believe that Austin based GSD&M is the agency that created the new Alliance creative. Why Peter has not made the announcement that this highly respected agency was engaged (they do rock), nor shared any research (prudent and wise to have been commissioned in this critical initiative) remains a mystery. Happy New Year. All the best,
Another lame attempt by commercial radio to alienate listeners with more noise and bad content. Thank God, we still have public radio to turn to.
I have a possible answer to the post above, wondering why Peter Ferrera may not have announced GSD&M as the agency behind this campaign.
Reading Peter’s comment from 12/20 that “these spots aren’t aimed at you and me” rang a bell. So I went back and checked some meeting notes from a few years back. Sure enough, that was the exact same line used by GSD&M (the agency for AT&T, PGA, SWA, et al) in a meeting with the Country Music Association when they presented the new creative for an industry-wide campaign to attract more listeners to the format.
Their killer concept? “Country. Admit it. You love it”.
Some in the meeting expressed concerns, but were told “these spots aren’t aimed at you”. (Apparently Country fans were supposed to ignore them.)
When details of the “Admit It” campaign began to leak out (both the concept and execution appeared to make fun of people who ALREADY liked Country) Country radio refused to buy in. In short order, the whole campaign was quietly shelved by CMA before it was ever officially launched.
I hope Peter will forgive those of us who don’t “trust in the experience and the track record of an ad agency that’s been here before”. I don’t see CMA listed on GSD&M’s website as a satisfied client.
In my opinion, Radio should treat this GSD&M creative the way CMA treated theirs, despite all the time and money invested. When a spot offends the very people who brought you to the dance, it’s time to Just Say No.
And what happens when a station owner who isn’t part of the Alliance decides to program a format that is on an Alliance HD-2 or HD-3 in his market, but brings in live talent (especially if they use talent that is known to the local listeners) to combat the automated format on HD?
My bet would be that the audience will stay with the analog station.
Raido companies need to first offer relivant programming to make the consumer see the value of actualy buying an HD radio, if they wait too long to show this value the window of opportunity will pass on to the next wave of technology.
Tony
https://www.bestradiocommercials.com
I’m glad you care so much about HD radio. I think that in the end of the day, the thing that matters the most is public awareness and clever advertisement.
The voices of those yelling adjust or-pass on to radio individuals in the fierce, quickly changing new media period are many; cautioning uproariously and much of the time to embrace whats ahead, not dread it. The expressions of these astute people ought to be not onl…